HOUSE SHADIS WARHAMMER 40K


A LEADING FAN-BASED RESOURCE FOR WARHAMMER 40K THEORY AND TACTICS
IN THE 1990s

May 3rd, 2016

I stopped keeping track of Warhammer 40,000 about 6 years ago, when my son's abductors tried to have me charged with libel for reporting his kidnapping.

Law enforcement refused to return my son, during years of alleged legal possession without cause or any due process.

Because of this fraud, six years later, I still have not met my son who is now 15 years old this May, since his kidnapping 74 days after birth.

I simply cannot go on. Not with Warhammer, or any other project, due to the constant abuse and refusal of the United States to return my child or let me see him.

My British counterpart attempted suicide three times this year, leaving in February, as the impact of the abduction and abuse took its toll.

I have no wish to continue the page after the abuse, even though the property is now showing its value in multimedia games this year (2016) for the first time.

While I have enjoyed Warhammer 40,000 - the fraud has created a false debt of over $50,000 USD against my estate and collection efforts in violation of Federal Law make it impossible for me to continue in the United States under any job in my home State, with over 70% of my income being taken by the abductors in violation of Federal Law (15 USC 1673).

I had to trademark my (1992) pen name to stop the abusers from using it to continue to steal my identity and defame me in ongoing efforts to damage my prior work. Law enforcement would do nothing.

Texas Attorneys asked me for $1000 USD and when I would not pay it, demanded I accept the filing of a false 'temporary order' to cover up the 15 year child concealment and criminal commercial sabotage.

After this was filed, they stopped negotiating and refused further contact as of February 10 2016, attempting to demand $29,000 USD from me illegally (15 USC 1673b, Federal law). Their reasoning, "I have never met him so I have no right to see him (my child)."

The abductors put him on Prozac at age 5 to stop his questioning, and then told him I abandoned him and moved out of the jurisdiction without giving the court (or me) notice of the new address. The State of Texas refuses to view this as child abduction or concealment, and claims no obligation to return my child. We attempted to sue the STATE OF TEXAS for failure to enforce the court order, and they plead Sovereign Immunity.

It is a fraud.

My child was taken from my car during Interstate transport in an agreed move, without warning, after taking $10,000 USD from me for this move to pay off debts conditional to assurance this was agreed relocation as a family - and this abduction falsely entered into DALLAS COUNTY COURT as an abduction where I was then denied the right to enter any evidence or ever face my accuser prior to a DEFAULT JUDGEMENT rendered while I was physically held outside the courtroom by court staff.

The court alleges I did not appear, despite their role in restraining me from entry for over half an hour, in criminal obstruction and witness tampering.

DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT also recorded that Veronica M. Petersen, the mother, was "WHOLLY IN DEFAULT" in the case in December 2001, having failed to appear at any hearing granted in 2001 and no notice granted of hearings after that date meeting any DUE PROCESS rule, resulting in "KELLY v KELLY, 2007 P100 Oklahoma Supreme Court". This made the case against my person "automatic mistrial" per operation of law.

Per TEXAS FAMILY CODE section 157.261, the maximum amount owed or sought was $500.00 USD in this case (a final judgment), and per Federal Law the claim is illegal and embezzlement form the Department of the Treasury of the United States, formally filed in complaint per 18 USC section 666.

A formal criminal complaint has been filed.

The child remains missing and abducted, taking to another county to conceal, and written concealment demands served in 232 pages of extortion. The matter remains an open criminal complaint under Oklahoma Title 21 Section 21-748 "Human Trafficking", and per 22 U.S.C. section 7102 is a felony Human Trafficking case under "The Victims of Violence and Trafficking Act of 2000" and 586 U.S. ____ (2019) case no 17-1091 "EXCESSIVE FINES" imposed in violation of 45 CFR 302.56(f) and to knowingly, willfully, and criminal embezzle from the Treasury of the United States in estate fraud per 45 CFR 303.6 and 303.100(a)(3) violation. These acts, crimes violating protections in 15 U.S.C. 1673(c) rule, and section 1692d protections, a crime themed extortion and blackmail with Federal Kidnapping (18 U.S.C. 1201).

State and local Federal officers concealed the case, violating Title 18 Section 2071, and sustained in criminal violation of 18 USC 3161 over November 2018 to May 2020 without trial.

House Shadis Founder,
H.M. Stryx

Copyright © 1996-2005 SDA3. Please regard the Copyright & Legal material.
Maintained by SDA3 & last major updated on 12/06/2005.